In the Name of Perseverance
I’m not going to say I submitted my just out, “Murder on Black Mountain” book manuscript, to a hundred publishers and agents, but it was pretty close to that. Of course the manuscript that Fire Star Press accepted was not the same one I first submitted to a publisher a year ago. It had changed, and changed quite a bit. My perseverance was tested, but it held out thanks to doses of positive feedback.
I was lucky in my effort to receive quite a bit of
feedback along with rejections, most of it encouraging. I always thought I had
the makings of a good writer and it helps to get some confirmation of that. The
publisher of my first book told me my book was one of the best they ever
published. Of course it was a small publisher but still the praise was big.
During this time I also submitted a short story that
was a finalist in a contest the NC Writers Network sponsors every year. That
was a great boost to my confidence and greatly needed at the time. Another
short story I submitted to a contest sponsored by a local university MFA in
Writing program also garnered a finalist note. The note said my story was the
only non MFA authored entry to make the finals. Take that!
No, really, positive feedback is important. Of course
there are other ways to get feedback. Our local chapter of Sisters in Crime,
“Murder We Write”, offers a special service to members; a free critique by one
of our members who happens to be an “Agatha Award” winner for editing. Her
book, “Don’t Murder Your Manuscript”,
was and still is a great resource. Let me tell you when my work came back
liberally sprinkled with red marks it was humbling. She sweetened the critique
however by including a personal note on how much she enjoyed the story. That
helped.
Like a lot of people, I don’t enjoy criticism, in fact
dread it. The problem with that is, unless you are in a classroom situation
where a letter grade is the proof, it’s hard to improve if someone doesn’t tell
you what you are doing wrong. Harsh critique can be a blow to the psychic and
easy to understand why people avoid it, but gird your loins and ask for
critique and your work will improve.
So the story first submitted had the opportunity to
change and grow, like a living being, maturing and reaching for its potential, a
potential it finally achieved when Cheryl decided my story was just what they
were looking for. Of course I did say “potential”, because the manuscript was
not perfect. In fact during the editing process Cheryl had several suggestions
for improving the book. All of which I agreed to and all of which I think made
the book better. I hope you will agree. Murder on Black Mountain
Thank you, Cheryl and Livia.
Ruben, I really did enjoy this story of yours. All manuscripts have problems. There will always be words that are left out, misspelled, or even sometimes used in the wrong way. Names sometimes become changed (I have done that myself--Jonas became Josiah in my latest ms.!) But you are right--we have to take the criticism and work with it, not resent it or let our ego get in the way of seeing things from another viewpoint and "fixing it" to make the book better. You have had some wonderful successes! Keep up the good work! Congratulations on your FSP release, MURDER ON BLACK MOUNTAIN, it really was a good'un!
ReplyDeleteCriticism can be helpful and it can also be profoundly hurtful, but I'm happy to see that you took it in stride and used it as a tool for improvement. Believe me, there's not one among us who hasn't received some harsh criticism. We who are passionate about writing recover from the blow and use it as tinder to fire us up even more about writing a good story. Cheryl will always lead you in the right direction.
ReplyDeleteCongratulations on this new release.
So many of us love a good mystery, Ruben. I want to wish you every success with "Murder On Black Mountain." How many books are planned for this series?