Search This Blog

Friday, March 3, 2017

BLOWING UP YOUR POV

            POV. Point of view.
           
            I started paying closer attention to point of view when I read a few reviews criticizing master romance writer, Nora Roberts, for mixing her POVs. “Shameful,” said one reviewer. “Incredible,” wrote another. How could she? Didn’t she know any better? All because Nora had the audacity to write this:
            “He needed, craved, the touch, the taste. Now. All of her, all his.
            Now those stars exploded, blinding her. She couldn’t get her breath as sensations pummeled her.”
            The flack flung Nora’s way was because she began a chapter in the perspective of one character and, in the midst of an intense scene, nonchalantly finished the chapter in the perspective of a second character. With a small smirk, I noted that changing perspectives wherever and whenever she felt like it had not hurt Nora Roberts’ books sales one teensy bit.
            Curiosity piqued now, I conducted a small survey of well-known writers over the past few decades on their particular use of POV.
            The writings of Dashiell Hammett, a hard-boiled detective writer in the 1930s and 40s, were not earthshaking when it came to perspective. He kept religiously to third person past tense.
            “Spade sank into his swivel chair, made a quarter turn to face her, smiled politely.”
            Ditto for western and crime writer, Elmore Leonard. He wrote for decades in third person selling not only books but movies as well. Hombre and Get Shorty were two of his best.
            But mystery writer, Sue Grafton, decided to mix things up back in 1982 when the reader learned her stories through the first person perspective of sassy Kinsey Millhone, a wonderful female protagonist written by a wonderful woman writer. (Note the excitement for my gender?) Sue wrote:

            “My name is Kinsey Millone. I’m a private investigator, licensed by the state of California. I’m thirty-two years old, twice divorced, no kids. The day before yesterday I killed someone and the fact weighs heavily on my mind.”
            Grafton not only switched voice, from third to first person, but she changed from present tense to past in the same paragraph. Changing tenses wasn’t done successfully until then either.
            J.A. Jance, another successful mystery writer, grew even bolder in the 2000s. In “Dance of the Bones”, she wrote all the main characters’ viewpoints in third person past tense except for J.P. Beaumont, one of her major protagonists. We learned J.P.’s contribution through the all-important first person. When Beaumont spoke, we paid more attention. His small but mighty input not only furthered the story but helped in its resolution.
            “Excitement bubbled in Brandon Walker’s voice and in mine as well. We were a pair of old hounds who had just caught a scent. It was a very faint scent and one that might not pan out, but it was still here, and we were on it.”
            But no writer strayed into the POV red zone: writing in first person, present tense until the blockbuster novel Fifty Shades of Grey became a literary phenomenon. Say what you will about her book, E.L. James managed to pull off nothing short of a coup when she wrote her trilogy in first person, present.
            Unbelievable! Critics cried her books were trash and so poorly written. Maybe so but they made publishing history and blew up forever some antiquated notions of writing.
            “His long index finger presses the button summoning the elevator and we stand waiting—awkwardly on my part, coolly self-possessed on his.”
            I feel like I’m in the elevator with Christian and Anastasia, don’t you?
            That was the point of the author’s point of view.
           
            Everything in the world has changed in the last hundred years and it’s fine that styles of writing have evolved as well. The detached third person point of view has slowly made way for the more involved first person POV to join it center stage. As authors, it’s wonderful to have more choice. As a mystery and romance writer, I am thrilled to be able to experiment with my writing.
            Here’s a toast to blowing up your POV!

Check out my website at www.jeanneharrell.com
and my amazon author page at https://www.amazon.com/Jeanne-Harrell


           


Wednesday, March 1, 2017

I Just Cannot





Editors are wonderful people. Well, the ones I have worked with are. ;-) For a writer, it’s hard to trust our babies—er, our stories—to someone else. But a good editor is a necessity, they help us polish our stories and make them shine. The refining process isn’t always easy—when your favorite line in the whole book doesn’t move the story forward, it needs to be cut. I’ve had this happen more than once and it never gets easier. But, a good editor can point out our errors and recommend changes without changing our unique voice and without making us feel like we should set our laptops on fire and move to an island with no writing implements and no internet connectivity.

I’m sure that each author has certain words and phrases that they overuse and I’m gradually getting a handle on mine. Therefore, before I send a story to my editor I search my document for all occurrences of the words that, very, really, and anything else that ends in ly and make changes as needed. I also do one last read-through of the entire manuscript in order to catch any phrases that I may have overused. 

Cricket is quite the feline editor.
 
However, there is one habit that I simply cannot seem to break. I love writing dialogue but, for some unknown reason, when I do, I stop using contractions. It’s very easy for me to start sounding like Data from Star Trek: The Next Generation. For those of you who aren’t Star Trek nerds, Data was an android who wanted nothing more than to be human. (Think Pinocchio in space.) Although he is far more human than he thinks, one of the things that makes Data different is that he doesn’t use contractions when he speaks. I would be awesome at writing his dialogue, LOL.

I use contractions in my every day speech, so I’m not sure why I tend not to when I write. When making revisions prior to sending my story to my editor I go through my dialogue and find as many contractions—or lack of contractions—as I can. However, whenever I get my feedback from the editor, there are always many instances that I didn’t catch. I don’t know if this is something that I’m always going to struggle with or if I’ll get better (hopefully the latter). After all, I just can’t is much catchier than I just cannot isn’t it?

As a matter of fact, in reading through this post, I found a few places where I could have used contractions but didn’t. I left them as evidence of my Contraction Dysfunction.

If you’re an author, what is your writing Achilles heel?

Until next month, happy reading!


Sign up for my newsletter here:  http://madmimi.com/signups/112968/join

Are we alone? By Michael E. Gonzales

Wow… what a week for science, eh? In addition to the other dozens of exoplanets discovered “out there”, seven new planets were discovered orbiting a relatively close star, TRAPPIST-1, only forty light years away!
Even more remarkable is the fact that three of the seven are located in what’s called the habitable zone, that ring around any given star where water can exist in its liquid form―liquid water is essential to the development of life―“as we know it.”  

These planets are roughly the same size as Earth, possibly older than Earth, so…this begs the question…is there life around TRAPPIST-1?

If so, is it just primordial, single-celled creatures in a soup of life, or mere microbes?
How deep does your imagination run?
Perhaps they are closer in development to Neanderthal man?
Could they be as advanced as we were in say, 1939, living in great cities, in command of electricity, dominating their seas, and flying through their atmosphere?
Or, just maybe, they are more advanced than we. Perhaps they already know about us, their instruments having detected our solar system a millennium ago. Who knows that they haven’t been listening to our transmissions, even visiting us since eons past―and are still?
Then why have they not contacted us? Sent us a signal of some kind?
What if a massive solar flare, or a collision with a comet, or―war, laid waste their once mighty civilization, and all that is to be found on their world is the skeleton of a once learned, cultured people, now lost for all time.
Were they advanced enough to hedge against such an eventuality? Had they outposts on one of the other worlds of TRAPPIST-1? Perhaps colonies far outside their own solar system? The nearest habitable world to theirs lay a mere forty light years away.
Did they come here in man’s distant past? Did they build the pyramids found around the world, were they the builders of Machu Pichu, Teotihuacan, and Angkor Wat? Are we the last vestige of their civilization?


Or maybe…they are on their way here now? A vast armada moving at near-light speed toward a technologically inferior species with the goal of conquest and genocide?


It may be possible that they launched an ark, a vessel containing the DNA of every life form on their world? And should we discover it, would it be wise to open that Pandora’s box?
Are the lines between science, science-fiction, and fantasy beginning to blur? No less a mind than Stephen Hawking warned mankind, “It is perfectly rational to assume intelligent life exists elsewhere. If aliens visit us, I believe the outcome would be much as when Columbus landed in the Americas.” Which, as we all know, didn't turn out well for the Native Americans.
This is the dystopian view.
Another view is that the more advanced a civilization is the less violent, and the more curious. Aliens might very well turn out to be an altruistic race, come to learn and to share their knowledge.
If the decades-long rash of UFO sightings is any indicator, then they are more like Captain Kirk following his prime directive; observe, do not interfere. And like Captain Kirk, doing a lousy job of it.
Seven new worlds. But this is nothing compared to all we have thus far located in a patch of sky no larger than a postage stamp held at arm’s length. Weekly, it seems, dozens of planets from this “tiny” spot are added to the exoplanet database. At this writing, there are 3,453 confirmed planets, and another 4,696 Kepler candidates.
It is likely we will know the answers to the questions posed above sooner than we might suppose.

Watch the skies.
And pick up Books I and II of The Unborn Galaxy -- while there's still time.